Kristen Breitweiser: 9-11 Cover-Ups, Building 7, and the Billion-Dollar Scam to Steal From Victims

Key Takeaways

Victims' families continue to demand full accountability and truth regarding the 9/11 attacks.
Questions persist about U.S. intelligence foreknowledge and failures to prevent the attacks.
Inconsistencies in official narratives of Flight 93, Flight 77, and Building 7 are highlighted.
Withheld government documents contribute to allegations of an extensive 9/11 cover-up.
The 9/11 victim compensation system is criticized for systemic inequalities and benefiting third-party investors.
A new 9/11 commission is advocated to thoroughly investigate the events and ensure justice.

Kristen Breitweiser questions why the CIA did not shut down the 'Yemen switchboard' despite alleged knowledge of Osama bin Laden's communications, particularly after the 1998 embassy bombings.
The CIA's failure to close the Al-Hada switchboard after the 2000 USS Cole bombing, which killed 17 sailors, is cited as a missed opportunity to delay 9/11.
The guest suggests intelligence agencies, including the CIA, FBI, and NSA, possessed sufficient information to prevent the attacks.

Concerns are raised over the secrecy and overclassification of 9/11-related information, advocating for declassification after 25 years.
The Millennium After Action Report was allegedly stolen and destroyed by Sandy Berger, with speculation it contained information protecting both the Clinton and Bush administrations.
Other withheld documents include NSA files and Inspector General reports from the FBI and CIA.

The discussion questions the official 9/11 narrative, suggesting a focus on Saudi Arabia may be a distraction from potential U.S. intelligence community involvement or protection of other foreign governments.
Countries like the UAE and Pakistan, and their financial dealings with hijackers, are highlighted for lacking credible investigation.

9/11 victims' families faced challenges in suing the U.S. government, with attorneys initially unwilling to pursue such cases.
The Victims' Compensation Fund, established nine days after 9/11, retroactively capped liability, preventing lawsuits against airlines and related entities.
The government's refusal to provide crucial information and lack of accountability led families to pursue civil litigation, including against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Questions arise regarding the delayed scrambling of F-16 fighter jets on 9/11, despite established hijacking protocols.
Eyewitnesses at the Flight 93 crash site in Shanksville reported no typical plane debris, engines, or luggage, describing a 'black hole'.
For Flight 77, the official account of an allegedly 'incompetent' hijacker performing a complex maneuver is questioned, alongside the absence of radar data from the Kentucky-Ohio border to the Pentagon.

Skepticism is raised about how alleged hijackers with limited flight training could execute complex aerial maneuvers, disable pilots, and navigate precise targets at high altitudes.
The feasibility of cell phone calls from 30,000 feet in 2001 is questioned due to the rarity of connections at such altitudes and speeds.
The absence of a prompt U.S. air defense response, allowing three planes to be hijacked over an extended period without intervention, is cited as a significant deviation from protocol.

The collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 is described as an anomaly that doesn't make sense, with questions raised about potential explosives, such as bombs in the building's couches.
The guest asserts a systemic and extensive cover-up of the 9/11 attacks, questioning the lack of public warning in the summer of 2001.
The absence of accountability for the attack on the Department of Defense is also highlighted as part of the broader cover-up.

A 2015 government fund, financed by fines from entities doing business with Iran, was intended to compensate victims of terror but allegedly excluded 9/11 families.
A significant portion of a $9 billion fine was controversially directed to New York for a bridge construction instead of to victims.
9/11 victims secured approximately 20,000 default judgments against Iran for its alleged role in cleansing hijackers' passports, representing their primary avenue for accountability and compensation.

Military families with judgments against Iran reportedly sold their compensation rights to third-party investors and offshore hedge funds, often for a fraction of the judgment value.
These hedge funds allegedly became primary beneficiaries of a Department of Justice fund, receiving guaranteed returns, potentially incentivizing lawyers to prioritize fund payouts over victims.
Legislation passed by Senator Menendez in 2012, signed by President Obama, allegedly created a loophole for 'successors in interest' (third-party investors) to profit from taxpayer money.

Anti-terrorism laws, initially intended to help victims, are criticized for being rewritten since the 1990s, broadening eligibility and allegedly harming the rights of direct heirs by delaying justice for over two decades.
Despite repeated requests, Congress has not investigated this legislation, even after Senator Menendez was jailed.
Concerns are raised about foreign nationals, including victims of October 7th attacks, lobbying the U.S. Congress for compensation from a fund designated for American terrorism victims, with overseas victims allegedly receiving significantly more.